Why So Serious?

If the evidence for Intelligent Design is not scientifically persuasive, why do opponents resort to bullying?

I’ve noticed that generally the validity of one’s argument is inversely proportional to the rhetoric and emotion with which it is expressed.    For an unfortunately all to typical example of the suppression of the evidence for ID, see: Bullies-R-Us: How “Freethought Oasis” Threatened “Disruption” and Pressured a College into Cancelling Intelligent Design Course

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anti-Spam Quiz: